• Introduction
• Functionality
• Vendor Summaries
• Compare Products
• Software Aspects
• General CMMS Vendor/Package Information
• Implementation
• Integration
• Multi-site Support
• Global Attributes
• Security and Data Integrity
• User Interface
• Look-ups and Searches
• Data Entry
• Help Features
• Workflow and Business Logic
• Analysis and Reporting
• Work Order Control
• Preventive and Condition-Based Maintenance
• Safety
• Priorities
• Planning and Scheduling
• Inventory Control and Purchasing
• Budgeting and Cost Reporting
• Equipment History
• Mobile Technology
• HR Management
• Fleet Maintenance
• Infrastructure Maintenance
• Service and Technology Asset Management
• Calibration
• Engineering Design to Maintenance
• Sustainability
• Other Specialized Modules

Infrastructure Maintenance

233. Does the CMMS handle the inventorying of 'linear assets' such as roads, pipeline, etc., as well as accurate recording and referencing on work orders of linear assets inspected and/or repaired (e.g., inventorying assets and recording work done on either side of a highway running through two counties in the middle of mile 82, or a 2-lane highway that splits into 4, or street furniture sitting beside the roadway, or pipe lying below the roadway)? Comprehensive (i.e., being able to handle situations above; GIS reference capability; fields for linear reference details such as asset length, asset length unit of measure, linear reference unit of measure, linear reference precision/granularity such as 0.999, and geographical reference description; can record work done on a work order referring to 'from' and 'to' points, 'from' and 'to' reference descriptions, 'from' and 'to' geographical references) Some linear asset capability as described above Limited (i.e., have GIS reference capability, and can use descriptive fields and other workarounds) No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

234. When two or more linear assets cross, can you a. Define depth for each linear asset at the point of crossing? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important b. Define other reference points? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important c. Define the depth of each segment? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

235. Can you assign work to multiple assets on a single work order (eg, a sewer flush involving multiple pipe segments can be assigned using only one work order, not one per segment)? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

236. Can you record work accomplishment for a given time period and track cumulative results and performance (eg, in the example above, record 1.4 miles completed of 10 mile sewer flush which is 85% efficient)? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

237. Can you can assign a work order to a “position” (eg, a lot # or address), when there is no asset defined (eg, installing a new water meter, doing a dig in a lot that is not adjacent to the pipeline), including tracking work order history for a given position? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

238. Does the CMMS track anomalies (ie, defects, features) on a linear segment (eg, rust on a pipe, crack in a roadway, corrosion on a bridge)? Comprehensive (ie, record condition information of each anomolie such as category, depth, width, length, and location; set thresholds for anomolies such as size; raise work order using appropriate job plan resulting from exceeding the threshhold; assign problem/cause/action codes for a given anomolie on the work order) Some Limited (ie, have GIS reference capability, and can use descriptive fields and other workarounds) Configurable Through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

239. Can you track the condition and other measures, for current and all previous inspections (ie, as opposed to just the latest snapshot), including: a. Asset level tracking (eg, overall deterioration of a park pathway)? Yes Some Configurable Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important b. Anomaly level tracking (eg, size of a crack in a pipe that is getting bigger over time? Yes Some Configurable Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

240. Can you draw a polygon on a map through an interface with GIS, and establish a route based on assets, type of work, PM past due, critical %, or other factors within the polygon? Yes Some Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

241. Can you score for each asset class (e.g., roads, buildings, pipes), condition rating methods used by different industries including a. 'Percentage of New' method (i.e., perception of inspector as to percent of new for specific user-defined criteria)? Yes Configurable Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important b. 'General Weighting' method (i.e., providing defect type, weight and ranking from 1-5)? Yes Configurable Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important c. 'Deficiency scoring' (i.e., establish defect type such as crack, and score each defect within the defect type such as for each crack)? Yes Configurable Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important d. Automatic updating of scores when repairs are done? Yes Configurable Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

242. Does the system distinguish between renewal costs as opposed to maintenance costs (e.g., put a sleeve over a crack on a pipe, versus removal of debris)? Yes Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

243. Do you have features and functions for inspection and risk assessment including a. Multiple inspections at multiple points on an asset/infrastructure? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important b. Recording results of a risk-based assessment defining risk and criticality of failure? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important c. Automatically increasing the frequency of inspection if the risk increases? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important d. Ability to define a 'confidence rating' on the risk? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important e. Providing inspector with nominal (i.e., expected) value for a given inspection and comparing to actual? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important f. Providing inspector with historical information including last value, date and description? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important g. Tracking replacement frequency for inspection tools? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important h. Defining a formula to determine the critical value for inspection readings? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important i. Automatically issuing a standard work order or PM procedure if the critical value is reached? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important j. Defining min and max threshold values for inspection readings and comparing to actual? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important k. Defining a tolerance percent? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important l. Using regression analysis to predict the next date for reaching the critical value? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important m. Recording of an 'extreme value' (i.e., amount which cannot be exceeded) and comparing to actual? Yes Yes, through 3rd party integration No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

244. Does the CMMS track attributes along the linear asset (eg, guard rail, culvert, signposts, furniture, mile markers) including: a. Graphical display of line segments showing location of attributes (eg, use different colours and shapes to show different features and their location along the line) Yes, comprehensive Some Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important b. Define work location on work a given work order based on attribute location Yes, comprehensive Some Configurable 3rd party No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

245. Does the CMMS have mapping capability to assist field workers in finding an asset or work site? Comprehensive (eg, user can place user-defined icon on a map and software will highlight route to get to a given asset/work site; forms part of the work order including driving directions if desired; has all the features of standard mapping software such as satellite view, traffic, fastest vs shortest route, etc.; mapping licenses handled through CMMS vendor) Some Limited (ie, using cut and paste or other workarounds) Configurable Through 3rd party integration (ie, direct license agreement with mapping vendor) No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

You have allocated a total of 0% of your total scoring allowance. Input the percentage you wish to weight this section for your final product comparison. A weight of 0% will indicate that this section is not to be scored. Scoring weight: % (Minimum 0%, maximum 100%)

Copyright © 2004 - 2023 Plant Services All rights reserved.
P: 630-467-1300 | 1501 E. Woodfield Rd. Suite 400N Schaumburg, IL. 60173 webmaster@putman.net