• Introduction
• Functionality
• Vendor Summaries
• Compare Products
• Software Aspects
• General CMMS Vendor/Package Information
• Implementation
• Integration
• Multi-site Support
• Global Attributes
• Security and Data Integrity
• User Interface
• Look-ups and Searches
• Data Entry
• Help Features
• Workflow and Business Logic
• Analysis and Reporting
• Work Order Control
• Preventive and Condition-Based Maintenance
• Safety
• Priorities
• Planning and Scheduling
• Inventory Control and Purchasing
• Budgeting and Cost Reporting
• Equipment History
• Mobile Technology
• HR Management
• Fleet Maintenance
• Infrastructure Maintenance
• Service and Technology Asset Management
• Calibration
• Engineering Design to Maintenance
• Sustainability
• Other Specialized Modules

Priorities

140. Specify the number of priority fields of EACH type below (do not double count fields). a. Time-based or Urgency 10 or more 1-9 0 Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important b. Asset/Equipment criticality 10 or more 1-9 0 Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important c. Parts criticality 10 or more 1-9 0 Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important d. Health and safety 10 or more 1-9 0 Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

141. Other (please specify) Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

142. User-defined (please specify) Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

143. Can the user develop a sophisticated scoring system for ranking the criticality of assets, as well as define relative risk? Comprehensive (i.e., can set up multiple user-definable questions for progressively scoring the severity of failure of an asset in terms of safety, environmental impact, quality, performance, etc; criteria, severities and scoring algorithms are user-definable; use of user-definable Boolean logic to determine final equipment criticality based on impact severities; calculation of probability of failure and relative risk; can schedule or filter alarms based on asset criticality ranking or relative risk) Some Simple (i.e., single, table-driven field for asset criticality) Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

144. Are priorities combined and used in scheduling (e.g., multiply priorities together)? Yes, comprehensive (i.e., users can build a priority ranking by weighting factors such as asset criticality, time-based priority, etc., as well as non-priority fields such as location and cost centre; user-defined algorithm for use in determining a scheduling priority) Yes, simple multiplication of priorities No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

145. Will the priority automatically increase if work is not completed on schedule, according to a user-defined algorithm (e.g., priority increases by one for each week that weekly PM's are past due)? Yes Yes, but not a user-defined algorithm No Rank the importance of this attribute: Very Important Important Somewhat Important Slightly Important Not Important

You have allocated a total of 0% of your total scoring allowance. Input the percentage you wish to weight this section for your final product comparison. A weight of 0% will indicate that this section is not to be scored. Scoring weight: % (Minimum 0%, maximum 100%)

Copyright © 2004 - 2023 Plant Services All rights reserved.
P: 630-467-1300 | 1501 E. Woodfield Rd. Suite 400N Schaumburg, IL. 60173 webmaster@putman.net