CMMS/EAM Review
Preventive and Condition-Based Maintenance Preventive and Condition-Based Maintenance

Work Order Control

105. Can you view the following from within the work order screen?
a. Standard parts lists for equipment to be worked Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
b. Parts on hand Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
c. Parts reserved (committed) Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
d. Parts on order Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
e. Parts in transit Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
f. Parts received but not yet inspected Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
g. Parts in quarantine Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
h. Repair history of equipment to be worked on Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
i. Repair history of components to be worked on Yes No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
106. Can you retrieve drawings directly into the CMMS, from say, within the work order screen?
Yes, and can edit them from within the CMMS
Yes, but cannot edit
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
107. Is there a hierarchy of work orders where each level can be scheduled separately?
Yes, 5 or more levels (e.g., project, master WO, WO, sub-WO, task, step)
Yes, 3-4 levels
Yes, 1-2 levels
Rank the importance of this attribute:
108. Can you tie multiple assets to a given work order number, such that for each asset you can define multiple schedulable tasks for each asset and a checklist of steps for each task?
Yes
Partially, ie through a workaround
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
109. Can you create blanket or standing work orders for planning and recording small jobs (i.e., to avoid issuing a separate work order for repetitive jobs under 30 minutes such as cleanup or setup), including
a. Recording standing work order number, as well as equipment number and/or cost center (i.e., establish a WO# that never closes and allow maintainers to charge one or more equipment numbers or cost centres with time or parts)? Yes
Partially, i.e. can provide blanket WO#
representing cleanup, but not detailed breakdown
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
b. Tracking planned vs actual hours for each equipment or cost centre under each standing work order number? Yes
Partially, i.e. for total blanket WO# only,
but not each equipment or cost centre
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
c. Add multiple activity codes that classify standing work orders, flag exceptions, mark them for more detailed analysis, or are used to avoid creating a slush fund (eg, for the standing work order “clean-up” could have an activity code for “environmental spill”)? Yes
Partially
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
d. Optionally close a standing work order such as once per year with charges apportioned as they occur (ie, rather than taking a huge cost hit at the end of year when the standing work order is closed) , or keep it open forever with costs allocated as they occur for accurate equipment history? Yes
Partially
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
110. On a work order, can users easily select new, reconditioned or used parts or components?
Comprehensive (e.g., using a single inventory number, but showing stock levels under each category or condition code; either serialized or non-serialized; algorithm favours lowest cost parts)
Limited (e.g., using work-around)
Rank the importance of this attribute:
111. Can a user create job plans for populating work orders?
Comprehensive (e.g., job plans can be created for any type of work order such as PM, corrective, etc; job plans can be nested such that job plans can be referenced as a step on another job plan; includes all labour, material, and contract services required; can be edited once a job plan becomes a work order; is optionally tied to specific asset(s) and/or condition(s); is easily identifiable as to what the job plan is for (eg, “change the oil” and its type (eg, safety procedure); includes performance and quality standards; links and distinguishes between global standard job plan and allowable local deviations such as extra steps for an older model asset; links and distinguishes between asset-related job plans, engineering activities, and operations-related job plans such as temporary operating instructions required before executing a job plan)
Most job plan functionality
Some job plan functionality
Configurable
Limited (e.g., using work-around like “copy” feature)
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
112. Can the user identify on a job plan tasks and steps that should be done by a contractor versus internal resources and determine impact to the job plan budget and overall work program when changing between contractor and internal options?
Yes
Some
Configurable
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
113. Can the user charge costs directly to the work order (eg, materials bought, hotel)?
Yes
Configurable
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
114. Can a user distribute costs across multiple account codes on a single work order (eg, maintenance on a roadway that goes through different counties)?
Yes
Configurable
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
115. Does approval level change when the work order is in overrun for total labor and material dollars booked:
Yes, for labor plus material/contract costs in overrun
Yes, but for labor overruns only
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
116. Can you prohibit a user charging dollars to someone else's cost center (e.g., tradesperson working in paper mill goes to stockkeeper and asks for rubber gloves, but gives powerhouse or pulp mill's cost centre number - will the stockkeeper be flagged that the cost centre is not valid for that tradesperson)?
Yes
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
117. Can you track contract maintenance?
Yes, through a separate comprehensive module that accounts properly for contract PO, & retains separate history of labor hours at true cost/hour and material used by contractors at true $ cost
Yes, through the work order system showing breakdown of labor hours at zero $/hr and material used, or through the PO system showing only total dollars spent on contract maintenance
Yes, through the purchase order system showing only total dollars spent on contract maintenance
Rank the importance of this attribute:
118. Can the system handle warranties including
a. Summary reporting of all work orders on warranty. Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
b. Preparing a warranty claim Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
c. Recording & tracking multiple warranties per asset Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
d. Recording & tracking warranty for any activity on a single work order (eg, one work order with 2 tasks - fix brakes & replace tail light, but only brakes under warranty) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
e. Recording warranty types (e.g., mfgr, vendor, extended) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
f. Tracking using graphical calendar presentation Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
g. Tracking by meter including start/expiration/threshold readings Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
h. Handling warranty renewals Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
i. Favouring serialized parts closer to warranty expiration Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
j. Favouring non-serialized parts closer to expiration Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
k. Parent/child option (i.e., user can opt to pass warranty to all children such as 3 yr end-to-end vehicle warranty) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
l. Parent/child option (i.e., user can opt to pass warranty to selected children) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
m. Handling group/master warranty (e.g., 60 pumps bought on same day from a vendor, that share warranty info) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
119. Does the CMMS have case tracking (ie, incident reporting, corrective action, investigations, assessments) capability (eg, a chemical spill, health or environmental incident, near miss, or regulatory audit infraction), including
a. Cases may launch 1 or more work orders tied to it, for corrective action and work to prevent recurrence Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
b. Track Case ID with automatic numbering Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
c. User definable case type (eg, global or local to a site) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
d. Hierarchical incidents (eg, parent = security break-in; children = 2 assets stolen, fire extinguisher fired off, and explosion) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
e. Case risk scoring including probability and impact evaluation Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
f. Modification and recording of new or edited steps including modified by, and date/time modified Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
g. Problem/Cause/Resolution codes and description Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
h. Issuance of instructions for Operations in order to deal more effectively with the case (eg, shut off valve or use equipment at half speed until permanently repaired) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
i. Follow-on work required or recommended in the form of a checklist, with optional link to activity / work order for each line item on the checklist Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
j. Cost / benefit analysis of optional countermeasures Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
k. Management of Change process initiated under multiple user-definable conditions (eg, spend and/or risk score exceeds a user-defined threshold) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
l. Campaign management tied to a given case, for permanent countermeasures that are implemented broadly (eg, as part of case tracking, monitor a campaign to change OEM/make/model of a part in similar equipment throughout the plant and across an enterprise) Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
m. Case tracking (ie, status, history of progress, approval history for all relevant steps) including monitoring status of linked projects, campaigns, work orders, tasks, activities, purchase orders, operating instructions, and all other objects Yes Configurable 3rd party No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
120. Does the CMMS support a function or position master that links to the asset master?
Comprehensive (eg, function “fume hood” with spec for size, cfm, ceiling height, duct size, etc.; then define different assets to fit the function; could have 2 components (motor + hood) or a single asset; function never changes but assets do; can have different brands fulfilling the need differently)
Some
Configurable
3rd Party
No
Rank the importance of this attribute:
You have allocated a total of 0% of your total scoring allowance.
Input the percentage you wish to weight this section for your final product comparison. A weight of 0% will indicate that this section is not to be scored.

Scoring weight: % (Minimum 0%, maximum 100%)